Tuesday, June 24, 2014

The Secret Grove Pt. 2



Last week I established the legitimacy of Secret Grove as a subgenre of children’s Fantasy literature and indicated the conventions of the genre. My sister pointed out Lewis Caroll’s “Alice’s Adventures in Wonderland” as both a Dream Vision and a Secret Grove. I only wanted to establish that genre is not by any means new, and selected Dream Vision at random. However, “Alice,”one of the earliest if not the first, Secret Grove is also a Dream Vision. This is cool, but not what I wanted to talk about today. Today I want to go over the conventions within Secret Grove, explain the rationale, and explore some of the unintended consequences.

Child Protagonist: This is a function of children’s lit, not Secret Grove specifically. We like to spend time with people that make us feel comfortable and good about ourselves, and it is just as true with books as in real life. With books, however, the reader has the choice to quit hanging out with the characters anytime they choose, free of guilt or social pressure (unless it is required reading). Kids like to be with other kids, and kids in books are the best because they want to be the readers’ friend without exception or prejudice. This means that when reading, kids can and do hang out with the older, slightly cooler social caste. Therefore, the prevailing wisdom follows; choose your target age range and make the protagonist one or two years older. This is solid, time tested advice, but I am also of the firm belief that, if they are interesting and written well enough, a protagonist of any age will work for any audience.

Orphaned or Child of a Single Parent: The easy answer to this convention is that absent parents immediately evokes sympathy. This isn’t just true for Secret Grove, it’s also prevalent in graphic novels and any other narrative where the writer wants to quickly establish character angst and moral high ground, so they can move on to the important, interesting part of the story. In many cases it’s lazy writing, but with Secret Grove it offers the added benefit of opening up new possibilities for the protagonist. Percy Jackson’s dad was never in the picture, not because he was a lazy deadbeat, but because he is a bonafide Greek god. Harry’s an orphan because his parents were killed fighting the ultimate evil, which means his adventures are not just about saving the world… it’s personal. A notable exception is the majority of C.S. Lewis’s Narnia universe. The protagonists do have a variety of parental/authority problems before crossing their portals, some that come into play later in the narrative. However, the only true use of the “abandoned at birth” trope appears in “The Horse and His Boy,” a narrative fully contained inside the Narnia universe without breaching our own, thus qualifying as a straight Fantasy, not a Secret Grove.

By circumventing this obvious childhood problem, Lewis shows a sensitivity all too rare in children’s literature. Kids can have absent parents, abusive parents, or irresponsible parents. Sometimes there are problems that are not the parent’s fault at all, but they are still unable to care for their kids the way they should. Sometimes kids have difficulties unrelated to their caregivers. They worry, lack confidence, misplace their priorities, get angry; the obstacles are typically different for children, but they often have the same root problems.

I am not saying that being thrown into foster care or having only one parent is no big deal. These are huge, true causes for angst in real life, and I am glad that they are addressed in children’s literature. It reassures kids who are in these situations that their concerns are legitimate, and helps kids who are not in these situations to empathize with peers who are dealing with these problems. However, foster kids and COSPs are overrepresented in children’s literature, which delegitimizes other problems. It feeds the misconception that, if you have both of your original parents, you don’t have any real problems or any excuses for feeling alienated and misunderstood. Being misunderstood, though, is a hallmark of childhood regardless of familial status. Kids typically lack the vocabulary and life experience to communicate exactly what it is they are feeling or want. They also are restricted by their own desire to be accepted by their authority figures, afraid that if they confess to having negative emotions, dissatisfaction or doubts, parents will perceive them as flawed or take their expression as a critique on their  leadership. Then when you consider that many adult problems and anxieties stem from beliefs subconsciously gained at a young age, it seems almost irresponsible to imply that the only thing that could go wrong in a kids’ life is their parent’s death.

Fantastic World: This world belongs to adults. Kids have limited earning potential, spending power, and social as well as physical mobility. Counters, doors, chairs, steps, shelves, eating utensils, computer keyboards; the entire world is scaled for adults. We create adult problems, often times through abuse of adult beverages and/or seeking adult activities, and we look for adult solutions. When the occasional kid crops up in adult oriented narratives, they are typically a nuisance, a McGuffin, or comic relief. Kids have no agency in our world, and it is as difficult for them to believe that they could help us fix our problems as it is for us. A Fantastic world, however, operates under a different set of rules. Perhaps in another world a child might have something to offer that an adult can not.

When we engage with narrative we are voluntarily spending time with other people in different places than where we are right now. Seeking out fantastic settings indicates dissatisfaction with the world in which we currently exist. If you more or less like the world you live in you will enjoy fantasizing about one strikingly similar to this, with more beautiful people and less traffic, of course. However, some people find themselves profoundly dissatisfied with real life, and enjoy spending time in universes that don’t remind them at all of their birth world. This, I propose, is why there appears to be a correlation with social undesirables (nerds) and Fantasy, Science Fiction, Manga/Anime, etc. These are worlds where incredible, unlikely things happen, where a simple farm boy can be the savior of the universe and a teenaged girl with a bow can be the catalyst for revolution. Children are more willing than most adults to abandon the realities of our world for magic, fantastic realms where they might have more agency.

Additionally, children are used to Fantasy. They are raised on Seuss, Boynton and Carle from birth, and smoothly transition to E.B. White and Beverly Cleary. Somewhere between “Pete the Cat” and “The Lord of the Flies” anthropomorphic animals and machines fade out and literature becomes boring, but until then kids are quite forgiving with their disbelief suspension.

Through a Portal: If kids are so good at jumping in and out of fantasy worlds, why not start in a fantasy world from the outset? The first reason is character identity. We like to have things in common with our protagonists, and it is difficult to identify with a kid who has had a completely different life experience than us. 

The second reason is that it helps with mental organization. As we read and watch more narratives we acquire vicarious experiences, which help us dive into unfamiliar settings faster. At a young age, however, beginning in a familiar setting helps orient the reader with recognizable points of reference.

The third reason is the appeal of dreaming that this can happen to you. As a kid, I searched for pixies so I could shake them down for dust, and had a happy thought ready at all times. I picked through attics and stared at pictures, and you can bet your swashbuckling pirate boots I climbed into every wardrobe I could find at least twice. I knew Neverland and Narnia weren’t real. I knew the only way I could go there was in a book, which really bummed me out because those adventures were on rails. I already knew them, knew what was going to happen, and Lewis was dead before I was born so there weren’t going to be any more. Still, that didn’t stop me from checking because you never know.

I know the solution now. Write your own story. That is how I got into writing fiction; acting out Middle Earth/Princess Bride/Neverland mashups in the backyard, the very worst fan fiction in the universe. After a lot more reading, classes and practice, I finally know enough about what is compelling about these narratives and how they should be executed to try one of my own.

Next week I will continue to ramble about Secret Grove conventions. I don’t know if you’ll enjoy yourself, but I will.

Tuesday, June 17, 2014

The Secret Grove Pt. 1



As storytellers gain experience in the kinds of things their listeners/readers/viewers like, genres emerge. For instance, there was a time when people wanted to hear about a dude falling asleep, meeting a guide and gaining mystical insight to such abstract concepts as the nature of God, fame, the afterlife and the universe in general. This genre is called “Dream Vision,” and people were absolutely mad for it. I’m not sure how well it would fly now, but some of the most popular and best literature written in the English language is Dream Vision. Nowadays in film we like to watch outlandish problems solved by equally outlandish heroes, primarily by punching and exploding things (Marvel and DC pantheons, Hellboy). In TV, we love to watch crimes, usually murders, being solved. Bonus points if it’s done using forensic evidence (Castle, Criminal Minds, Bones, CSI <insert large metropolitan area here>). In books, this week we like paranormal/crime, paranormal/romance, and more murder solving.

It’s important to know that genres develop based on the needs of the consumer. Thrillers are written, sold and read because people are bored. Romances sell because people feel unloved. Pulitzer Prize winners sell because… actually, that is a complicated bag of worms. I’ll complain about that later. The point is, genres tell us something about the people that read them. This is as true for children’s literature as it is for adults. However, children have vastly different needs than their adult counterparts, resulting in vastly different and oddly specific genres. There is the ever popular “Boy and His Dog” genre (Old Yeller, Where the Red Fern Grows, Because of Winn-Dixie), the children’s version of Historical Fiction that places children in the thick of major events (Johnny Tremain, Rush Revere), and the “Secret Grove*,” in which children leave this familiar, ordinary world and have many adventures in a new, fantastic one. This last genre is of particular interest to me since this is where my book falls.

I have seen the subgenre of Secret Grove formally recognized only once, which either means that I haven’t been hanging out with the right people or we have a problem in not taking children’s literature seriously. Probably both are true. Regardless, this is a very real literary phenomenon that deserves attention. Perhaps it was J.M. Barrie who did it first with “Peter Pan.” C.S. Lewis did it in his highly allegorical “The Lion, the Witch and the Wardrobe,” which developed into the “Chronicles of Narnia” series. Madeline L’Engle followed suit with “A Wrinkle in Time” which also blossomed into a series of books. Norton Juster’s “The Phantom Tollbooth,” Julie Edwards’ “The Last of the Really Great Whangdoodles,” Astrid Lindgren’s “Mio, My Son,” and let’s not forget the lesser known iterations that tried to recapture Lewis’s magic such as “The Archives of Anthropos” series by John White and “The Imager Chronicles” by Bill Myers; all of these excellent examples of the Secret Grove. God forbid we forget that one by that one lady about the kid with the glasses. What was its name again? Then there are the ones that don’t technically take place in another world, but bring that other world into ours such as “The Spiderwick Chronicles” by Tony DiTerlizzi and Holly Black, and “Jumanji” by Chris Van Allsburg. Finally, “kids save a fantasy world” as a genre is central to the 2005 film “Neverwas,” meaning it is accepted as an instantly recognizable feature of children’s literature.

Genres often share more than one theme in common, and such is the case with Secret Grove narratives. Key features are of course child protagonists, often orphaned or the child of a single parent (COSP), and entrance to a fantastic world through a portal. The journey is often made with at least one sibling or close friend.  Like Dream Visions, there is usually a guide or guides to help the children navigate their new environment. The protagonist(s) learn that the world is under imminent threat from unspeakable evil (explicit menace appropriately scaled to the age of the target audience), but it is hoped that their arrival portends the fulfillment of an ancient prophecy. The children must then traverse hostile terrain and engage with various monsters employing tactics with vaguely allegorical connotations including brute force, deception, and temptation, until the final showdown with the evil threat. What happens after the inevitable victory depends on variations in the plot. If it turns out the protagonist is orphaned/COSP because they are actually natives of the fantasy world and were hidden away on our normal, boring world to protect them from the ultimate evil, the protagonist is allowed to stay and be a celebrated hero and/or continue to have adventures, at which point the narrative has the chance to morph into a straight Fantasy should it expand into a series. If, however, the protagonist has a loving family at home who will worry about their absence, they will be returned to our world to discover that time works differently in the opposing universes, and that the whole of their adventures has taken anywhere from the span of an afternoon to a matter of seconds in our time.

This is just preliminary information. In the following week I’ll reveal my hypothesis on the rationale behind Secret Grove conventions, some of their unintended consequences, and perhaps how I plan to maintain or subvert these tropes. In the meantime, I would love to know your thoughts on this topic. What is/was YOUR favorite Secret Grove novel and why? Did I get some conventions wrong, or are there some I have missed? Is “The Archives of Anthropos” too blatant a derivative of Narnia to be worth the read, or does it sufficiently advance the genre?

*I believe the term “Secret Grove” is a reference to C.S. Lewis’ “The Magician’s Nephew,” in which the protagonists magically travel to a park-like area with many trees and pools scattered throughout. The pools are gateways through which the children travel to the worlds Charn, Narnia, and Earth, and it is suggested that each pool hides a world of its own.

Tuesday, June 10, 2014

Baby Steps



After finishing “Watchmen,” I wanted to knock out “The Fault in our Stars” by John Green, for no other reason other than it has been recommended too many times for me to ignore. Imagine my surprise when I discovered that the film just came out, so there are no copies available at the library. I’m reading “Catch-22” by Heller instead.

Additionally, I’m writing a résumé and including all of my publications (exactly one), which made me go back and read it again. It was an ambivalent experience for only one reason; I wanted to fix it. My submission was as good as I could possibly make it at the time. I wrote it quickly and did some light editing, but there were few changes I could find. Now I can find a lot. Sentence restructuring, word reduction, tailoring for the audience, it could have been tighter and thus more effective. This is a good thing. It means I’m better now. However, it also means that I released inferior work and it’s now part of my permanent record. Same for the guest blogging I did for the cloth diapering people. Not exactly bad work, but flawed and that’s a little embarrassing. Maybe even negatively impacts my shot at a job.

Still, it’s publication and that’s better than nothing. I'm not sure if guest blogging counts, and I have one more article under review. It's all non-fiction, and I haven't been paid for any of it. I still have a long way to go to selling fiction.

Tuesday, June 3, 2014

Treading Water


Post graduation, I had every intention of updating the blog every Tuesday, but between caring for and bussing my beautiful but wounded wife to and from work, and looking after my two kids, and not coming up with anything specific to talk about, meeting my deadline is more difficult than I previously thought

I have been reading “Watchmen,” watching “Stargate: Atlantis,” and pecking away at my own work. Atlantis has reminded me how good, personable characters can save a weak plot. Alan Moor’s work verifies that multiple points of view inside a single narrative can be effective, even desirable. Maybe I’m strange for enjoying time spent with Rorschach, but we couldn’t get the whole story with only his point of view and besides, it’s good to take a break from him every once in a while. He’s an intense fellow.

Meanwhile, I recently finished editing a piece on the inoculation conspiracy. Hopefully it will appear in a university magazine, but not in time to pad my resume for the job hunt. C’est la vie. Guess I’ll keep plugging away at my fiction and see where I land.