In
Plato’s Cave, slaves are chained to a wall. They see shadows cast on the
opposite wall, and debate among themselves concerning their meaning, purpose,
and nature. These slaves are meant to represent us now on earth, with our
limited understanding, trying to grasp high concepts such as the nature of
love, justice, honor, truth, pain, and hope, among others.
We
experience these things in our lives, but we do not understand them. We don’t
know what it is that makes people love us, or why we love others, so we
fantasize about it in bodice rippers and chick flicks, Twilight and Sex in the
City and Romeo and Juliet. We instinctively know about justice. We know when it
has been violated, particularly when we are on the losing end of it, but can we
define it? Plato himself tries, albeit imperfectly. Why does pain exist? What
purpose does it serve? We rebel from the idea that we should accept it,
avoiding it at great cost. We rail against God and the fates when we experience
it.
We
are slaves, chained in place, seeing the shadows of these things thrown against
the wall, enduring the assault of these things on our psyche and struggling to
know what they are and what they mean. We understand only in part. If we could
slip the chains and turn around to see the things that cast these shadows,
perhaps when we are recaptured and returned to our place we will be better
comforted, having known the true form of what these things are.
I
am currently working on a book called First Monday Park. The bulk of this story
takes place in a world where these things are more knowable. Postmodernism, the
worldview that embraces the shadows and says, “These flickering forms are
whatever you want them to be,” does not exist. It is a place where people know
what justice is, know what pain is for, and know how to hope without
foolishness.
My
problem is that I am a slave that is still chained. I certainly have no hope of
escaping myself, for I do not believe in transcendentalism on earth. The best I
can do is inquire of other slaves who are also chained to the wall. I have to
try to understand justice as Plato understood it before I can render it
properly in the book. I have to know pain as Lewis believed it to be before I
can show it in the real world. I have to seek out the sophists and
philosophers, the askers and the thinkers, and consider what they say. I must
discover if there is a consensus on these issues, and if there is good reason
behind them. I must not bend to majority, but to truth, and place that in my
book.
In the interests of answering these
questions, I am putting together a reading list of books that deal with the
high minded, difficult questions. I want to cut underneath appearances and
understand what things truly are. I am willing to stretch the limits on this. I
will read philosophical essays and thought exercises, theology books, novels
and quotes, anything that might help clarify what things are, how they present
and why me might be confused when we see them, and how these things work
together and support one another into a comprehensive picture. If you know of
any, please send me authors and titles.Some of the ones I already have on the list are
“The
Republic” by Plato, “The Problem of Pain” by C.S. Lewis, “Wild at Heart” and “Captivating” by
John and Stasi Edlridge, “I, Robot” by Isaac Asimov and “The Upanishads.”
Thanks for the feedback.
No comments:
Post a Comment